Please check to see if this annotated bibliography needs any correction, analysis and reflection sections should be unique and in your own voice. makes changes if necessary

The important part is analysis, reflection and a citation

This is an example of a annotated bibliography from my teacher:

DIXIT, D., YOUNGMIN, Y., VOLINO, L. R., & PATEL MANSUKHANI, R. (2015). Empagliflozin: A sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor for treatment of type 2 diabetes. American Journal Of Health-System Pharmacy, 72(22), 1943-1954. doi:10.2146/ajhp150071

This study was testing the value of empagliflozin, which is a medication used to inhibit a protein in the kidneys that increases excretion of glucose to the urine in treatment of Type II diabetes. The results showed that this medication helped to lower glycosylated hemoglobin values in Type II diabetics, which is a test that shows long-term control of blood glucose levels. It also showed reductions in body weight and blood pressure, however it showed an increase in urinary and genital infections.

In my opinion, the article was reliable and seemed to report their conclusions with honesty. There was an addendum since the original publishing that included some additional side effects that had been reported to the FDA in association with this medication, and the authors also stressed the importance of further research of this medication, particularly in combination with other drugs, to ensure safety.

Personally, I learned a lot from this article in both about the drug itself as well as how the kidneys work in excreting glucose and how it would be beneficial for those with Type II diabetes. I do not think that patients would find this particular research article helpful, however, as it is filled with scientific and medication terminology that made it somewhat difficult to read. The authors definitely wrote it for an audience of medical professionals

attach file is mine please look at my teacher’s example and check to see everything looks fine make changes if neccessary